![]() Colour combinations represented abstractly and without shape or contours need a sustained and stable description of the junction of colours. The CJEU confirmed that the graphical representation for colour combinations must be precise and sustained so that trademarks are defined in a predetermined and uniform manner. The judgment specifies the requirements for the registration of colour combination marks in the light of EU law. Red Bull has had a bad run as the General Court also sustained the EUIPO Board of Appeal decision of to dismiss the figurative trademark registration application for a device of a parallelogram composed of 2 fields in different colours ( T-305/17 ). Interestingly, in a decision handed down on, the Polish Supreme Court had also found that Red Bull’s registration of its combination of blue and silver did not mean that every form without contour or shape comprising combination of colours could be protected by trademark rights ( I CSK 778/15 ). The description indicating only the proportions of the two colours is not sufficiently precise. The mere indication of the ratio of the two colours allowed for the arrangement of those colours in numerous different combinations. A verbal description of the sign must clarify the subject matter and scope of the protection and cannot be inconsistent with the graphic representation or give rise to doubt. The description did not indicate the type of arrangement in which the two colours would be applied to the goods. ![]() The CJEU agreed with Optimum Mark that the graphical representation did not systematically arrange the colours by associating them in a predetermined and uniform manner and that the verbal description was not sufficiently clear, self-contained and precise ( Heidelberger Bauchemie ). They were accompanied by descriptions that the ratio of each of the two colours was ‘approximately 50% - 50%’ and that the two colours were juxtaposed to each other and would be applied in equal proportion. The graphical representation of the two-colour trademarks was: The trademarks were invalidated on request of Optimum Mark, a Polish entity. Red Bull’s argument that the requirements for clarity and precision of colour combination marks ultimately resulted in abolishing these and only allowing figurative or position marks did not succeed, despite MARQUES siding with Red Bull and intervening before both the General Court and the CJEU. The CJEU dismissed Red Bull’s appeal and confirmed the decisions of the General Court, which in turn maintained the declaration of invalidity by the EUIPO. On 29 July 2019, the European Court of Justice (CJEU) handed down a ruling that ended a six-year battle over the validity of trademark rights in the name of Red Bull to the combination of the colours blue and silver (EUTM nos.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |